Pearl Jam^3

So thanks to my very good friend Mollie, I was able to see Pearl Jam last night, thus continuing my streak of seeing them every time they’ve come around since my first concert in 1994 (the famous Orpheum concert, which singer Eddie Vedder referred to more than once last night).

They played a good assortment of songs, opening with “Release” and then kicking into “Severed Hand.” They toned it down on the first encore with a couple of Bob Dylan covers in honor of Dylan’s birthday, “Forever Young” and “Masters of War” (which Mollie was particularly pleased with). Overall, though, it was an energetic set, with the second encore featuring a number of rockers, including “Spin the Black Circle” and “Comatose” before wrapping up with Neil Young’s “Rockin’ in the Free World.”

I was glad I got to hear live versions of “Comatose” and “Gone,” two of my favorite songs on the new album. I missed “Rearviewmirror” and “Parachutes,” though. Overall, a great performance from PJ as usual.

I was talked into seeing a midnight showing of X-Men 3 tonight, so I’ll have comments on that next time.

Pearl Jam^2

Last Thursday I ended up driving all over southern Mass. (long story), but it afforded me the opportunity to give Pearl Jam’s new self-titled album the kind of listen it deserves. Ever since Vs., I’ve never liked a Pearl Jam album on the first run-through. Ever. Some are easier to love than others—Yield and Binaural, for instance—but every time, I go in hoping against hope that PJ will have taken a page from U2 and put out a really great-sounding, commercial album; and instead I discover they’ve put out a thoughtful, artistic record with some great tracks, but rarely a single even close to “Even Flow” or “Alive” (though their two biggest hits ever were actually “Better Man” off Vitalogy and their cover of the creepy sixties hit “Last Kiss”).

In any event, I listened to the album twice over the course of my journey last week, and over the next few days I found some of the riffs and lyrics echoing in my head; a sure sign that I had gotten used to the album. I never know whether I like an album by PJ or anyone else on the first listen; I have to get to know it, like a new friend.

Pearl Jam is indeed a more aggressive album than much of their fare since Vs., but I wouldn’t say it rocks more than, say, Yield. My cousin Mike, a diehard PJ fan, said the album reminded him of Vitalogy. I can hear that in there, especially with “Comatose,” whose verse riff reminds me of the chorus riff for “Spin the Black Circle.” Also, the hook for “Severed Hand” sounds a little too much like the opening of “Porch” off Ten. Where are the spine-tinglingly epic hooks of “Alive” or “Even Flow” or “Jeremy” or “Rearviewmirror”? Even this “aggressive” album feels subdued next to their first two.

But a lot of the commercial, metal edge I’m looking for is in the mixing, not the music (for example, had Binaural been entirely mixed by Brendan O’Brien instead of Tchad Blake—and heavily promoted—I think it could have been a monster hit…for pete’s sake, “Breakerfall” wasn’t even a single!). Now that I’ve listened to Pearl Jam a few times and gotten over my initial disappointment that Pearl Jam again refused to clone Ten, I think this is one of their better albums. It quickly leap-frogged Vitalogy, No Code and Riot Act in my estimation, and it may even beat Yield to be my number two favorite (after Binaural; and I’m not counting Ten or Vs., because they’re classics and I’ve listened to those albums a million times).

As for the songs themselves: let’s see. “Life Wasted” is a good, straightforward rocker, as is “World Wide Suicide.” “Comatose” won me over with the riff during the line “Comatose with no fear of falling,” and once I got past the similarities with “Porch,” “Severed Hand” is definitely a lot of fun. “Markers in the Sand” is my current skipped track. I’m not sure what it is; the tempo is all wrong, the riff is a little wimpy; it’s just not my thing. However, I love the Beatles-esque “Parachutes.” Definitely one of PJ’s catchier tunes of late.

I didn’t like “Unemployable” when I first heard it on the radio, but coming after “Parachutes” seems just right, and I like the story Vedder tells. “Big Wave” is a wonderfully dumb rocker, a rarity for Pearl Jam, and it may be my favorite on the album. I could do without the “Wasted Reprise”; I wish Pearl Jam would stop with these indulgences on their studio albums (“Aye Davanita,” “The Color Red,” and so forth). “Army Reserve” was another one I had to get used to, but the lyrics won me over. Then out of nowhere is “Come Back,” a bluesy torch song by lead guitarist Mike McCready and Vedder. The album wraps up with “Inside Job,” which I haven’t really heard often enough to develop an opinion on.

For this fan, Pearl Jam is definitely an improvement over Riot Act, but it’s not quite as good as Binaural. Still, it’s great to have some new Pearl Jam, and even better, I get to see them at the whatever-they’re-calling-it-now Garden next week…

EDIT: I forgot about “Gone.” Another one I wasn’t sure about initially, but has now grown on me…I like the subtle opening with the build-up to the chorus. A depressing song, though.

I’m also wondering what the next single will be. I think it should be “Parachutes,” or maybe “Gone,” but for some reason, my instinct tells me it will be “Army Reserve.” PJ doesn’t seem to pick the most radio-friendly singles, for whatever reason. “World Wide Suicide” was a better choice than usual.

Da Vinci Code Quest II

Turns out I did manage to become one of the finalists for the Google Da Vinci Code Quest. DG and I received the prop cryptex yesterday. The password for the cryptex is printed right on the packaging—”GRAIL”—but DG was highly amused to discover that the prop was so simple, you only need to line up the last two letters to open the thing.

There’s one more part to the game—a timed trial of five puzzles. I imagine whoever wins will either be a games genius or have enlisted the help of her various puzzle-expert friends, but DG and I plan to give it a go anyway.

Hulk smash

As most of my readers probably know, I collect action figures. Recently I’ve been after the Hulk vs. Leader two-pack from Toy Biz. There have been a few Hulk figures over the years, but not many compare to this beauty. Or beast, as it were.

Hulk is even getting an Abomination to fight. The (store) hunt is on.

ToyFare #107

Issue #107 of ToyFare magazine hit the stands today, with two pieces I wrote. One is my usual “What’s In Stores” section (page 107), and the other is an Onion-style joke news article, “FCC says ‘Heck no!’ to Hellboy” (page 14), in which the FCC forces Hellboy to change his name to “Heckboy” to make it more family-friendly.

You can find ToyFare at comic stores and some hobby shops, or you can order a copy here when they put it up on the site (they usually allow online orders a month or so later, after it’s had time to sell out on the stands).

I also wrote three of the “Classified Ads” on page 15 (the Oz-themed ones, as in Wizard of).

Da Vinci Code Quest

Well, I just finished the Da Vinci Code Quest on Google. DG and I have been doing it for over a month, but I had to be ready for the last puzzle, because the first 10,000 people to solve it get a free cryptex prop. It’s actually another part of the game, but we care less about that than just getting the prop.

Anyway, for the last puzzle you had to watch a movie on Google Video and then answer some DVC-related questions. I got through the whole thing, including filling out the address form in the end, in about sixty seconds. Hopefully it was enough–I’m not sure when they’ll let us know if we won. Either way, it was a fun little pastime for a few weeks.

New Hellboy videogame info

After more than a year since the initial announcement, Konami has finally released some screenshots and a cinematic trailer for their upcoming Hellboy videogame.

The overall response from fandom seems to be “meh,” but I’m willing to give it the benefit of the doubt. The fighting system sounds interesting. A lot of complaints seem to be about the graphics, but to be honest, while I do have aesthetic appreciation for nice graphics, I’ll take great gameplay over pretty pictures any day. Kind of like how I prefer a decent amount of articulation on my action figures, rather than those plastic statues McFarlane Toys puts out these days.

I also watched the Halo 3 trailer–nice graphics, not much idea what’s going on, but I’m sure it’ll be an awesome game. An Xbox 360 will probably be the only thing on my Christmas wishlist this year.

Batman’s “goof”

I admit it, I have both a very high and very low sense of humor. I can laugh at a joke about Churchill and a “barf-o-rama” on Family Guy. I won’t apologize for that; it’s the way I am.

Thus, I link you to this. The panels are from a real comic book from the 1950s—a more innocent time, when certain words had a different meaning than they do today.

Sunday night cartoons

Last night was quite a night for new Fox cartoons–we got a new Simpsons, Family Guy and American Dad. I remarked to DG that I’m beginning to come around to liking Simpsons a bit more than Family Guy again, if only because Seth MacFarlane &. Co. have become a bit too dependent on cutaways and pop culture references.

I never quite understood the difference that loading up a show with pop culture references made until recently, when I was reading about Spongebob Squarepants and how that show’s appeal to both children and adults lies in its simple (if bizarre) storylines that rely on situation, story, and character for laughs, rather than obvious satire or references to William Shatner singing “Rocket Man.” A show like Fairly Odd Parents, on the other hand, relies heavily on pop culture jokes.

And that’s largely the difference between The Simpsons and Family Guy, though The Simpsons has certainly spread its share of pop culture references over the years. However, even after more than ten years of syndication, The Simpsons isn’t at all dated, whereas the clock is already ticking on the first season or two of Family Guy. Fifty years from now, scholars will be examining The Simpsons to find out about the beliefs and values of 1990s and early twenty-first century America, while Family Guy will probably be fairly oblique to all but the most specialized academics.

That said, the most memorable bit I saw last night was during Family Guy, when Herbert—the elderly pedophile who’s always after Chris—challenges a haunted tree (long story) and battles it in Lord of the Rings-fashion. The best moment is when Herbert is falling down the chasm and grabs his walker in mid-air, just like Gandalf plucking his sword during the beginning of The Two Towers. That’s the sort of thing that keeps me watching the show. And as DG pointed out, the Family Guy skit that got me to laugh the hardest wasn’t a pop culture reference (the “barf-o-rama” in the episode “8 Simple Rules for Buying My Teenage Daughter”). In terms of getting me to laugh out loud, Family Guy is definitely the winner.

One thing that’s surprised me is how American Dad has improved from its first season. Initially I didn’t find it funny at all. In the first few episodes, it was clearly an outlet for MacFarlane’s rage against both the political and cultural conservatism of the country, and that sort of satire just wasn’t working. That’s been toned down in recent episodes and the writers have been letting the characters grow a bit, even throwing in a few good gags here and there. It’s not nearly as reliant upon pop cultural references as Family Guy (perhaps a conscious decision on the producers’ part), which I think helps distinguish it from that show. Oddly, American Dad is more of a show about family function and dysfunction than Family Guy.

Of course, I have to wonder how long Fox will allow three cartoon shows to dominate its Sunday night programming block. All I do know is that DG and I always find something else to do from 8:30-9. Maybe they should bring back Futurama

Speaking of American Dad and Family Guy, this is pretty fun.

You bet I have

Greedo: “I’ve been looking forward to this for a long time.”

Han Solo: “Yes, I’ll bet you have.” BLAM!

This is some of the best news I’ve heard in ages:

“Fans can look forward to a September filled with classic Star Wars nostalgia, led by the premiere of LEGO Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy video game and the long-awaited DVD release of the original theatrical incarnations of the classic Star Wars trilogy.”

You can read the whole article here.

A lot of fans are already pissing and moaning about “giving Lucas even more money,” but as someone who has never bought a single Star Wars movie on DVD, I couldn’t care less about that. I don’t like the Special Editions nor the prequels and have no interest in owning either; however, I will shell out my hard-earned cash for DVDs of the original trilogy. I love those movies and am thoroughly pleased Lucas has finally realized how he can get my money.

1 27 28 29 30 31 41